Farmers' willingness to accept compensation to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution: the Limpopo River Basin of South Africa

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Different farmers require different compensation payments to be incentivized to participate in water quality improvement-related agri-environmental schemes (AESs) and payment for ecosystem services (PESs). This is because they differ in their farm management practices, cost structures and attitudinal characteristics. However, these differences are rarely characterized in the design and implementation of AESs and PESs in the Global South. Using a discrete choice experiment, we investigate farmers' willingness to accept compensation to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution in the Limpopo River Basin of South Africa to observe whether these differences matter. Conditional, random parameter and latent class logit models are estimated. Our latent class logit model identified one random choice class (farmers making random responses) and three preference classes of farmers (low-, moderate- and high-resistance) with dissimilar compensation requirements to alter their status quo farm management practices to improve water quality. Gender, age, education, farming experience and secure tenure rights are key drivers of preference heterogeneity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Apio, A. T., Thiam, D. R., Dinar, A., & Meyerhoff, J. (2025). Farmers’ willingness to accept compensation to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution: the Limpopo River Basin of South Africa. Environment and Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X25100168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free