Prevention of febrile leucopenia after chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: No significant difference between granulocyte-colony stimulating growth factor or ciprofloxacin plus amphotericin B

22Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial, 40 stage IV breast cancer patients undergoing intermediate high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin or methotrexate), received either recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF, group I) or ciprofloxacin and amphotericin B (CAB, group II) for prevention of febrile leucopenia (FL). In group 1, seven of 18 patients developed FL (after 10/108 courses); in group II, seven of 22 patients (7/98 courses) (P = NS), Median hospitalization duration and costs were not different, RhG-CSF was 6.6 times more expensive per course than CAB. In conclusion, prophylactic CAB has similar efficacy to rhG-CSF in this setting, and is more cost-effective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schröder, C. P., De Vries, E. G. E., Mulder, N. H., Willemse, P. H. B., Sleijfer, D. T., Hospers, G. A. P., & Van Der Graaf, W. T. A. (1999). Prevention of febrile leucopenia after chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: No significant difference between granulocyte-colony stimulating growth factor or ciprofloxacin plus amphotericin B. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 43(5), 741–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/43.5.741

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free