Prognostic models in multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges in clinical integration

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, multiple sclerosis (MS) is of great individual health and socio-economic significance. To date, there is no prognostic model that is used in routine clinical care to predict the very heterogeneous course of the disease. Despite several research groups working on different prognostic models using traditional statistics, machine learning and/or artificial intelligence approaches, the use of published models in clinical decision making is limited because of poor model performance, lack of transferability and/or lack of validated models. To provide a systematic overview, we conducted a “Cochrane review” that assessed 75 published prediction models using relevant checklists (CHARMS, PROBAST, TRIPOD). We have summarized the relevant points from this analysis here so that the use of prognostic models for therapy decisions in clinical routine can be successful in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Havla, J., Reeve, K., On, B. I., Mansmann, U., & Held, U. (2024, December 1). Prognostic models in multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges in clinical integration. Neurological Research and Practice. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00338-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free