Carotid endarterectomy is superior to carotid angioplasty and stenting for perioperative and long-term results

18Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has challenged carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the therapy of choice for carotid disease. This meta-analysis aims at summarizing the most current body of evidence. Methods: All prospective, controlled clinical trials comparing CEA versus CAS were included. The outcome measures of interest were relative risk (RR) of 30-day stroke, 30-day stroke/death, long-term risk of stroke, and risk of restenosis. Results: The RR of 30-day stroke for CAS was 1.6 times that of CEA (RR 1.6; 95%CI 1.2-2.0, P =.001). The 30-day RR of stroke/death was 1.5 times higher for CAS (RR 1.5; 95%CI 1.1-2.1, P =.008). There was a higher risk of long-term stroke (RR 1.2; 95%CI 1.0-1.5, P =.043). The risk of restenosis was twice for CAS (RR 1.8; 95%CI 1.1-3.1, P =.04). Conclusion: The 30-day RR of stroke, stroke/death, long-term risk of stroke, and risk of restenosis are consistently higher for carotid artery stenting (CAS). © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arya, S., Pipinos, I. I., Garg, N., Johanning, J., Lynch, T. G., & Longo, G. M. (2011). Carotid endarterectomy is superior to carotid angioplasty and stenting for perioperative and long-term results. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 45(6), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574411407083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free