Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps,myths, and moving forward

64Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Qualitative methods are gaining prominence in psychology, as well as related fields such as organizational behavior. Yet, we can find little evidence of qualitative research in our top industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology journals. We argue that the lack of research employing qualitative methods is a loss for the field, and we explore the reasons why few scholars adopt this approach. We then explore where this type of research is published and where it is not. Finally, we discuss and debunk several myths that continue to characterize qualitative methods with an eye toward encouraging a greater appreciation and acceptance of this research tradition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pratt, M. G., & Bonaccio, S. (2016). Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps,myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 93–715. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.92

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free