Reservoir placement options: a state of the art review

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reservoir placement for the inflatable penile prosthesis has evolved over time with surgical safety and functional outcomes driving innovative changes. This state of the art review describes contemporary placement options for the inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir, including traditional space of Retzius placement and other alternate reservoir placements. The space of Retzius remains a familiar location for virgin placements while submuscular placement has gained popularity for its versatility and lower risk of visceral injury. The lateral retroperitoneal location can be considered for a patient with a hostile pelvis. A comparison of complications and functional outcomes highlights benefits and drawbacks of each location. This review aims to equip the prosthetic urologist with modern techniques and a surgical armamentarium that can address any reservoir placement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ivan, S., Pryor, J., Maffucci, F., & Simhan, J. (2025). Reservoir placement options: a state of the art review. International Journal of Impotence Research. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01082-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free