Abstract
This study addresses the critical gap in Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation for business intelligence by conducting a rigorous comparative analysis of Llama3-70b-8192 and BambooLLM across five key data analysis tasks. Utilizing the AdventureWorks Cycle dataset, we developed a comprehensive evaluation framework measuring task efficiency, weighted accuracy, and misinterpretation rates. Results demonstrate that Llama3-70b-8192 outperforms BambooLLM with a 40% lower misinterpretation rate and 25% higher task efficiency across structured and interpretive business intelligence challenges. This study highlights the potential for optimizing fine-tuning strategies for task items that combine structured and interpretive elements, offering valuable insights for optimizing fine-tuning strategies and informing future research directions in LLM evaluation for business intelligence applications.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
-, B. J., & -, S. A. (2024). Comparative Performance Analysis of Large Language Models in Generative Business Intelligence: Insights from Llama3 and BambooLLM. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.33967
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.