Comparative Performance Analysis of Large Language Models in Generative Business Intelligence: Insights from Llama3 and BambooLLM

  • - B
  • - S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study addresses the critical gap in Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation for business intelligence by conducting a rigorous comparative analysis of Llama3-70b-8192 and BambooLLM across five key data analysis tasks. Utilizing the AdventureWorks Cycle dataset, we developed a comprehensive evaluation framework measuring task efficiency, weighted accuracy, and misinterpretation rates. Results demonstrate that Llama3-70b-8192 outperforms BambooLLM with a 40% lower misinterpretation rate and 25% higher task efficiency across structured and interpretive business intelligence challenges. This study highlights the potential for optimizing fine-tuning strategies for task items that combine structured and interpretive elements, offering valuable insights for optimizing fine-tuning strategies and informing future research directions in LLM evaluation for business intelligence applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

-, B. J., & -, S. A. (2024). Comparative Performance Analysis of Large Language Models in Generative Business Intelligence: Insights from Llama3 and BambooLLM. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.33967

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free