Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Coal fly ash and slag waste residuals from coal combustion are an issue of importance as one of the possible sources of environmental contamination and exposure to NORM. This study compares the results of different radiological risk assessment scenarios targeting terrestrial biota at a legacy site in Croatia that contains large quantities of coal ash with an enhanced content of radionuclides originating from previous industrial activities. The ERICA assessment tool was used for a risk assessment, which included data from borehole samples with a maximum depth of 6 m and trees as the primary reference organisms. The results of the risk assessments from various depth ranges found the radiological risk to the reference organisms to be negligible, regardless of the depth range, since the screening dose rate of 10 µGyh−1 was not exceeded in any of the assessments. The risk assessment results from all depth ranges show higher total dose rate predictions when the tool’s default CR values are used, compared to the site-specific ones, which is in agreement with previous studies on the application of the ERICA tool. A comparison of results from different spatial radiological risk assessments showed that sample depth does not affect the estimated total dose rate to biota.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Getaldić, A., Surić Mihić, M., Veinović, Ž., Skoko, B., Petrinec, B., & Prlić, I. (2023). Comparison of Different Radiological Risk Assessment Scenarios at a Coal Ash and Slag Disposal Site. Minerals, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060832

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free