Comparative Analysis of Resource and Climate Footprints for Different Heating Systems in Building Information Modeling

7Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Buildings play an important role to meet Sustainable Development Goals, especially regarding the use of resources and greenhouse gas emissions. They are increasingly designed with energy-efficient solutions regarding their operations, while the related use of natural resources is still insufficiently considered. In this article, a methodology in Building Information Modeling is proposed to measure the resource and climate footprints of buildings’ heating systems. The methodology is applied to a case study building in Germany. The studied heating systems include a gas condensing boiler, ground-source heat pump, ground-source heat pump with a photo-voltaic system and air-source heat pump backed up with a gas boiler. Next to the operational energy, the production and transport of the heating systems were also studied. Results show that heating system operations have the largest impact and that the variant of ground-source heat pump combined with photovoltaics (GSHP + PV) has the lowest impact. In comparison with the gas boiler (GB), savings of 75%, 47%, 80%, and 84% are addressed to climate, material, energy, and land footprints, respectively, while the water footprint of GSHP + PV is 73% higher than that of GB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sameer, H., Behem, G., Mostert, C., & Bringezu, S. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Resource and Climate Footprints for Different Heating Systems in Building Information Modeling. Buildings, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111824

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free