Unpacking Generative Artificial Intelligence-Powered Crisis Communication From a Moral Angle: The Role of Moral Outrage, Authenticity, and Forgiveness

2Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to advance crisis communication by incorporating morality in understanding crisis communication and explicating effective strategies for using artificial intelligence (AI) technology (e.g., ChatGPT) in the context of the ‘preventable’ cluster of crisis types. To this end, we conducted an online experiment, adopting a 3 (crisis type) × 2 (crisis response source label) between-subjects design. The results indicate that scansis elicited greater moral outrage than other crisis types and that a crisis response from ChatGPT led to lower authenticity than a crisis response from a PR representative. Indirect effects analyses demonstrated that moral outrage, authenticity and forgiveness mediated the effects of crisis type and message source label on behavioural outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S., & Chon, M. G. (2025). Unpacking Generative Artificial Intelligence-Powered Crisis Communication From a Moral Angle: The Role of Moral Outrage, Authenticity, and Forgiveness. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free