Abstract
This is a story of a failed study. In 2007, the authors set out to demonstrate that Kurzweil 3000, an adaptive text-to-speech software program, would help any student revise with its read-aloud function and numerous writing tools. During the course of the study, the authors confronted their misconceptions about students' technology use and realized that they could not definitively support their original hypothesis that Kurzweil could help students substantially revise their writing--despite the potential that still exists for technology like Kurzweil to be successfully used in writing centers. Participants' focus group responses, which provided considerable and interesting details about their use of Kurzweil, led the authors to an important discovery: they learned that students value tutors' advice during writing center sessions, particularly when tutors introduce new ways to revise, but tutors need additional support, training, and confidence to introduce these technological tools and strategies to students. Thus, in order for students to use technology like Kurzweil in meaningful and productive ways, well-trained tutors need to incorporate this technology into tutorial sessions and model how to use its features effectively. By reporting on a failed study, the authors reinforce the value of empirical work in writing centers, especially because their own student-users have taught them how to better use, incorporate, and plan technology use. (Contains 3 notes.)
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Conard-Salvo, T., & Spartz, J. M. (2012). Listening to Revise: What a Study about Text-to-Speech Software Taught Us about Students’ Expectations for Technology Use in the Writing Center. The Writing Center Journal, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1745
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.