Improvisation and the Unnameable: On Being Instrumental

  • Fischlin D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This editorial frames the problem of improvisation as both an embodied social practice and an "unthinkable" event-horizon of the possible. If this observation approximates a truth about improvisation, we may well ask, how musical improvisation in the forms it has taken in the last century, aligns with other social practices in which similarly high stakes are in evidence. The editorial addresses how emergent rights discourses (especially in the latter half of the twentieth century) coincide historically with the arrival of radical forms of free improvisation (think John Coltrane, Ornette Coleman, and Albert Ayler). Are there ways of thinking about the aesthetics of improvisation that overlap with re-invigorated notions of civic engagement that move us closer to meaningful forms of social justice and progressive change? Can musical improvisation in its most achieved forms lead to enacting other forms of human potential?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fischlin, D. (2009). Improvisation and the Unnameable: On Being Instrumental. Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études Critiques En Improvisation, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21083/csieci.v5i1.1121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free