Comparison of tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate as extraction solvents for urinary organic acid analysis

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The analysis of urinary organic acids is crucial for the diagnosis of many inborn errors of metabolism. A vital part of the analytical process is the extraction procedure. The sensitivity and linearity of the analysis of 26 diagnostically important urinary metabolites with tetrahydrofuran (THF) and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) as extraction solvents were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Good linearity (r2>0.90) was observed for all of the compounds in the investigated concentration range (290-900 μmol/L) for both solvents. For less polar compounds, THF extraction yielded lower or similar sensitivities as compared with EtOAc (sensitivity ratio: 0.6-1.3). For more polar compounds, however, much higher sensitivities were observed when THF was used (sensitivity ratio: 1.8-17.2). Our results provide information concerning the use of THF for the sensitive quantitative analysis of polar urinary metabolites which are difficult to quantify using EtOAc. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wittmann, G., Karg, E., Mühl, A., Bodamer, O. A., & Türi, S. (2008). Comparison of tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate as extraction solvents for urinary organic acid analysis. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 31(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-007-0767-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free