Just War contra Drone Warfare

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I present a two-pronged argument for the immorality of contemporary, asymmetric drone warfare, based on my new interpretations of the just war principles of “proportionality” and “moral equivalence of combatants” (MEC). The justification for these new interpretations is that drone warfare continues to this day, having survived despite arguments against it that are based on traditional interpretations of just war theory (including one from Michael Walzer). On the basis of my argument, I echo Harry Van der Linden’s call for “an international treaty banning all weaponized UAV [uninhabited aerial vehicles].”.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hall, J. M. (2023). Just War contra Drone Warfare. Conatus - Journal of Philosophy, 8(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.34306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free