Genetic variant of luteinizing hormone in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage

12Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because the biological and clinical significance of a genetic variant of luteinizing hormone (LH) is unclear, we therefore evaluated the occurrence of variant LH in women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and related it to specific LH concentrations, luteal function and pregnancy outcome. Of the 85 RSA women, 30 (35.3%) had variant LH (28 heterozygous and two homozygous), and 55 women (64.7%) a normal wild-type LH ratio. These frequencies are similar to those reported from the general Finnish population. No significant differences were observed in specific LH concentrations based on LH status (7.2 ± 1.4 IU/l, mean ± SEM, variant LH, versus 8.5 ± 1.6 IU/l, wild-type LH). Variant LH was twice as common in women with body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2 (9/15, 60.0%) than in those with BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 (21/70, 30.0%, P < 0.05). The presence of variant LH was not associated with any clear effect on endocrine variables such as endometrial maturation or mid-luteal phase oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. During follow-up, 23 women with variant LH (76.7%) and 41 with wild-type LH (74.5%) became pregnant: 14 miscarried (21.9%, six with variant LH and eight with wild-type LH) and two had ectopic pregnancies, whereas 48 (75.0%) succeeded (17 with variant LH and 31 with wild-type LH). LH concentrations before pregnancy were similar in women with a successful outcome (8.0 ± 1.3 IU/l) or with a miscarriage also in that pregnancy (7.4 ± 1.4 IU/l). In conclusion, variant LH is common in RSA women who are relatively overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2) but its presence is not reflected in endometrial maturation and miscarriage rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tulppala, M., Huhtaniemi, I., & Ylikorkala, O. (1998). Genetic variant of luteinizing hormone in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction, 13(10), 2699–2702. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.10.2699

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free