Associations of Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Individual Differences among Correctional Psychologists

  • IG M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to examine associations between secondary traumatic stress (ST), job burnout (BO) and several psychological variables such as world assumptions and locus of control in correctional psychologists. Methods: This study utilized information provided by 87 currently prac¬ticing correctional mental health providers (psychologists) in the correctional settings across Russia in St.-Petersburg, Belgorod, Vladimir, Kaluga, Ryazan, etc. The sample included 51 men, 36 women. The mean age of participants was 34.9±6.9 (ranging from 25 to 48 years). Participants reported working a mean of 6.23±3.5 years (ranging from 3 months to 15 years) in a correc¬tional setting. Subjects were assessed with Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS), World Assumption Scale (WAS) and Locus of Control (LC) Scale. Three sets of statistical analysis were provided: ANOVAs between-group comparisons with STS and BO as factors and Spearman correlation analyses. Results: The results of our study reveal that burnout and secondary traumatic stress in correctional psychologists are signifi cantly positively related and thus may be exacerbated by each other. BO is signifi cantly negatively associated with WAS benevolence scale and the WAS self worth scale and STS is signifi cantly negatively associated with WAS benevolence scale and the WAS meaningfulness scale. However, LC and its components are negatively associated with BO, but not with STS. Conclusion: The main future direction of our research is to construct nonlinear model of burnout with STS, WA and LC components as predictors, identify its parameters and make its validation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

IG, M.-P. (2017). Associations of Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Individual Differences among Correctional Psychologists. Journal of Forensic Science and Research, 1(1), 018–034. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free