What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are 553 development banks in the world: 18% of these institutions have emerged since the 2008 financial crisis. There is a large theoretical literature on such institu-tions, but the evidence on their effectiveness is scattered. This paper provides a systematic review of causal effect studies of one of the largest and most representative development banks in the world, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES). We review 48 academic pa-pers that estimate BNDES loans and credit programs impact in several policy dimensions. In general, the evidence indicates that development banks can be an effective instrument to increase investment, exports, employment and GDP, particularly when borrowers are micro, small and medium-sized companies. The Brazilian experience also suggests that development banks can be an important tool to fight against climate change, reducing deforestation. On the other hand, evidence indicates that the greatest difficulty for these institutions is to gener-ate positive impacts on productivity, an essential variable for economic growth. Finally, the evidence is inconclusive on political influence on development bank’s loans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barboza, R., Pessoa, S., Roitman, F., & Ribeiro, E. P. (2023). What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 43(3), 646–669. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572023-3467

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free