Damage in rubble mound breakwaters. Part II: Review of the definition, parameterization, and measurement of damage

19Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Damage in rubble mound breakwaters has been addressed for more than 80 years and, as reported in "Part I: Historical review of damage models", a considerable number of hydraulic instability models have been proposed up to date. Most of them were developed from small-scale physical tests, based on damage descriptors not always parameterized nor measured in the same way, which indeed complicates the comparison and reproducibility from different experimental data sources. The latter is increased by the lack of a standardized methodological approach inside an experimental and measuring process that involves many sources of uncertainty. Currently, the latest innovations applicable to damage measurement, together with the growing demand of reliable decision-making tools for conservation/maintenance strategies and structural/operational risk management, venture an upcoming proliferation of prototype monitoring, as well as new approaches aimed to characterize the stochastic nature of damage evolution. In this context, this paper is meant to review the concept of damage in rubble mound breakwaters, the different proposals for its parameterization, the past and present measuring techniques, and main challenges in the near future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campos, Á., Molina-Sanchez, R., & Castillo, C. (2020, May 1). Damage in rubble mound breakwaters. Part II: Review of the definition, parameterization, and measurement of damage. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/JMSE8050306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free