Impact of the national protocol for malaria treatment on prescribing patterns in Gezira state, Sudan

6Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A cross-sectional study to assess the impact of the national protocol for malaria treatment was conducted in a town in Gezira state, central Sudan, in 2001. Most of the 165 doctors and medical assistants interviewed (80.0%) had not been trained in the protocol and many (57.5%) were still using their own protocols. Analysis of 410 prescriptions showed chloroquine was the most common antimalarial drug used (69.5% of prescriptions). Compared with a study before implementation of the protocol, more prescriptions met the protocol standards for correct chloroquine dose, whereas regimens for administration of intravenous quinine were still inadequate. The study showed a lack of continuous supervision, training and follow-up in the protocol guidelines and negative attitudes of hospital specialists towards the protocol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, M. E., & Yousif, M. A. (2004). Impact of the national protocol for malaria treatment on prescribing patterns in Gezira state, Sudan. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 10(4–5), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.26719/2004.10.4-5.566

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free