Antifungal Resistance in Cryptococcal Infections

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Antifungal therapy, especially with the azoles, could promote the incidence of less susceptible isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii species complexes (SC), mostly in developing countries. Given that these species affect mostly the immunocompromised host, the infections are severe and difficult to treat. This review encompasses the following topics: 1. infecting species and their virulence, 2. treatment, 3. antifungal susceptibility methods and available categorical endpoints, 4. genetic mechanisms of resistance, 5. clinical resistance, 6. fluconazole minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), clinical outcome, 7. environmental influences, and 8. the relevance of host factors, including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters, in predicting the clinical outcome to therapy. As of now, epidemiologic cutoff endpoints (ECVs/ECOFFs) are the most reliable antifungal resistance detectors for these species, as only one clinical breakpoint (amphotericin B and C. neoformans VNI) is available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melhem, M. S. C., Leite Júnior, D. P., Takahashi, J. P. F., Macioni, M. B., Oliveira, L. de, de Araújo, L. S., … Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2024, February 1). Antifungal Resistance in Cryptococcal Infections. Pathogens. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13020128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free