Unsettling NbS: A pathway towards shifting colonial power relations in nature-based solutions research and practice

14Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article presents a synthesis and analysis drawing from NbS Justice, NBS Indigenous and NbS more-than-human literature, Indigenous governance, Indigenous planning and coexistence planning literature. The aim of this paper is to contribute to understandings of NbS and colonialism through critical reflection, as well as provide tools for action to for researchers and practitioners. In settler-colonial contexts, NbS are colonizing by default. Colonialism operates through producing and growing power asymmetries, which exist in NbS research and practice. These power asymmetries are perpetuated and accelerated by settler NbS practitioners and researchers. However, knowledge co-production that embodies ethical space principles with Indigenous partners in NbS may support power redistribution. To support settler NbS practitioners and researchers, we present a potential process to support mutually beneficial knowledge co-production consisting of three stages; preengagement, internal engagement and external/collective engagement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rees, A., & Doyon, A. (2023, October 1). Unsettling NbS: A pathway towards shifting colonial power relations in nature-based solutions research and practice. PLOS Climate. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free