Policy experimentation in China's economic rise

516Citations
Citations of this article
384Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Policy experimentation is frequently highlighted as a potent means to facilitate institutional innovation, and avoid reformist leaps in the dark by injecting bottom-up initiative and local knowledge into the national policy process. Yet experimentation remains a surprisingly vague concept in the debate over variants of economic governance. This article contributes to the study of experiment-based policymaking by examining the distinctive tools, processes, and effects of experimental programs in major domains of China's economic reform. China's experience attests to the potency of experimentation in bringing about transformative change, even in a rigid authoritarian, bureaucratic environment, and regardless of strong political opposition. Large-scale experimentation stimulated policy learning and economic expansion effectively in those sectors in which political elites could benefit from supporting new types of private and transnational entrepreneurial activity. Conversely, experimental programs largely failed in generating an effective provision of social goods which would require a combination of active societal supervision and strict central government enforcement to make it work. Though the impact of reform experiments varies between policy domains, China's experimentation-based policy process has been essential to redefining basic policy parameters. At the heart of this process, we find a pattern of central-local interaction in generating policy - "experimentation under hierarchy" - which constitutes a notable addition to the repertoires of governance that have been tried for achieving economic transformation. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

499Citations
1197Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heilmann, S. (2008). Policy experimentation in China’s economic rise. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-007-9014-4

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 163

67%

Researcher 36

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 29

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 155

66%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36

15%

Business, Management and Accounting 28

12%

Environmental Science 15

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0