Applying a Precautionary Approach to Mobile Contact Tracing for COVID-19: The Value of Reversibility

9Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic presents unprecedented challenges to public health decision-making. Specifically, the lack of evidence and the urgency with which a response is called for, raise the ethical challenge of assessing how much (and what kind of) evidence is required for the justification of interventions in response to the various threats we face. Here we discuss the intervention of introducing technology that aims to trace and alert contacts of infected persons—contact tracing (CT) technology. Determining whether such an intervention is proportional is complicated by complex trade-offs and feedback loops. We suggest that the resulting uncertainties necessitate a precautionary approach. On the one hand, precautionary reasons support CT technology as a means to contribute to the prevention of harms caused by alternative interventions, or COVID-19 itself. On the other hand, however, both the extent to which such technology itself present risks of serious harm, as well as its effectiveness, remain unclear. We therefore argue that a precautionary approach should put reversibility of CT technology at the forefront. We outline several practical implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nijsingh, N., van Bergen, A., & Wild, V. (2020). Applying a Precautionary Approach to Mobile Contact Tracing for COVID-19: The Value of Reversibility. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17(4), 823–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10004-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free