The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: A retrospective study

23Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Material and Methods: The retrospective study included a total of 156 cycles (141 couples) and was performed in our center over a 24-month period. The semen parameters were recorded for each man and each insemination. The semen samples were re-evaluated after the preparation process. Post-wash TPMSC values were divided into four groups; Group 1: <1×106; Group 2: 1-4.9×106; Group 3: 5-9.9×106; Group 4: 10×106 and >10×106. Post-wash inseminated semen volume was divided into three groups; Group 1: 0.3 mL; Group 2: 0.4 mL; Group 3: 0.5 mL. The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes was evaluated. Results: The pregnancy rates per cycle and per couple were 27.56% and 30.49%, respectively. There was not a significant relationship between the inseminated semen volume and pregnancy rate (p>0.05). However, a significant linear-by-linear association was documented between the TPMSC and pregnancy rate (p=0.042). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the post-wash inseminated semen volume should be between 0.3-0.5 mL. An average post-wash total motile sperm count of 10×106 may be a useful threshold value for IUI success, but more studies are needed to determine a cut-off value for TPMSC. © 2013 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koyun Ok, E., Erbil Doǧan, Ö., Emre Okyay, R., & Gülekli, B. (2013). The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: A retrospective study. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association, 14(3), 142–145. https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2013.52280

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free