Turing machines and evolution. A critique of Gregory Chaitin's metabiology

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the paper is twofold. First, it presents the fundamental ideas and results of the "metabiology" created by Gregory Chaitin. Second, it shows why metabiology ultimately fails as a candidate for being a proper mathematical model for the theory of evolution by natural selection. Because of genocentric reductionism and biological oversimplifications, metabiology should be perceived rather as an expression of the philosophical worldview of it's author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siedliński, R. (2016). Turing machines and evolution. A critique of Gregory Chaitin’s metabiology. In Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric (Vol. 48, pp. 133–150). University of Bialystok. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free