18FDG PET in oncology: The best and the worst (review)

61Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The clinical added-value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) in the management of oncology patients is increasingly documented. In the present review, we discuss both the benefits and the limitations of 18FDG PET in different cancers. Considering the literature data and our own experience, we also indicate the best clinical approach to optimize the use of metabolic imaging in oncology.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belhocine, T., Spaepen, K., Dusart, M., Castaigne, C., Muylle, K., Bourgeois, P., … Flamen, P. (2006). 18FDG PET in oncology: The best and the worst (review). International Journal of Oncology. Spandidos Publications. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.28.5.1249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free