Do we actually need aging clocks?

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aging clocks use machine learning to estimate biological age as a proxy for general health state. Here, we critically examine their practical value, highlighting fundamental challenges: abstract definitions, inconsistent clinical validation, and ignored prediction uncertainty. By comparing aging clocks with expert risk scores, direct outcome predictors, and emerging large health models, we question their benefits and encourage researchers to explicitly justify clock advantage over established alternatives, ensuring truly actionable insights. (Figure presented.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kriukov, D., Efimov, E., Gelfand, M. S., Moskalev, A., & Khrameeva, E. E. (2026). Do we actually need aging clocks? Npj Aging, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-025-00312-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free