Appropriateness of trifluridine/tipiracil in the clinical practice of third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To help to remove misperception of an appropriate position of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Materials & methods: The RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used by a panel of Italian experts to develop recommendations concerning daily practice with FTD/TPI. Forty-three clinical scenarios were discussed in two rounds and the resulting statements were rated as appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate, according to the median score. Results: Several topics were dealt with, covering the profile of eligible patients, therapeutic options beyond the second line, the practice of treatment with FTD/TPI, evaluation and efficacy and toxicity, as well as costs and compliance. Conclusion: FTD/TPI is an important therapeutic resource in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer that combines manageability and safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barone, C., Bartolomeo, M. D., Lonardi, S., Maiello, E., Martinelli, E., Moretto, R., … Pinto, C. (2021). Appropriateness of trifluridine/tipiracil in the clinical practice of third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Future Oncology, 17(14), 1749–1759. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-1181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free