Abstract
We return to the issue of reinforcement addressed by Smith, Beran, Couchman, Coutinho & Boomer. We argue that their concerns are unfounded because (a) reinforcing the ‘uncertain’ response need not undermine an otherwise convincing demonstration of animal metacognition, even for skeptics, (b) with or without metacognition, in the absence of the appropriate reinforcement contingencies, animals will not choose at all.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Jozefowiez, J., Staddon, J. E. R., & Cerutti, D. T. (2009). Reinforcement and Metacognition. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 4. https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2009.40007
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free