Abstract
This article was migrated. The article was not marked as recommended. Introduction: The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of different modalities of simulation learning in medical students and the resulting stress response. Methods: Students were randomised into two groups for simulation learning, on the assessment and management of acutely ill patients. Group 1 performed assessments in a static individual format, whilst group 2 performing assessments in a dynamic group format. The stress response was measured by heart rate monitors worn by students, and performance was graded by a final simulator assessment. Results: The stress response did not significantly vary between groups, but there was a significant increase in heart rate in all students during the simulation learning; with a mean increase of 34 beats per minute in group 1 and 38 beats per minute in group 2. Performance in the final simulator assessment was significantly better in group 2, with a mean score of 21.5 points, compared to 16.2 points in group 1. Conclusion: A dynamic group simulation learning strategy is more effective in teaching medical students than simulations performed individually. Simulation learning, however; results in a significant stress response in all students, which must be carefully managed when delivering this type of learning.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kocialkowski, C., Rybinski, B., Hainsworth, L., & Yang, D. (2020). Simulation Learning: Effectiveness and Stressfulness in Medical Student Teaching. MedEdPublish, 9, 143. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000143.1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.