Abstract
We investigated the relative importance of convexities (protrusions) and concavities (indentations) for the perception of shape. On the one hand, it has been suggested that convexities determine the shape of an object, whereas concavities merely act as "perceptual glue" between the convexities. On the other hand, it has been argued that concavities are more salient than convexities. We show that participants find it easier to detect asymmetry in a 2-D silhouette when there is a mismatch between the shapes of convexities on either side of the axis of symmetry than when there is a mismatch between the shapes of concavities. This is the case even when the concavities are closest to the axis of symmetry, and despite the usual bias toward this axis in symmetry perception. We suggest that the actual shape of concavities is less important in symmetry perception, because the main role of concavities is to act as part boundaries in the representation of the shape of objects. Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hulleman, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2007). Concavities count for less in symmetry perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(6), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193115
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.