Sex-Specific Outcomes After Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Patient-Level Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcification increases the procedural complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with worse outcomes, especially in women. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for vessel preparation in severely calcified stenotic lesions before stent implantation. Sex-based outcomes of IVL-facilitated stenting have not been defined. Methods: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of the 4 prospective, single-arm Disrupt CAD studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVL-facilitated stenting. Patient baseline and procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were examined based on sex. The primary safety end point was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. The primary efficacy end point was procedural success, defined as stent delivery with residual in-stent stenosis ≤30% without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. Results: A total of 628 patients were included, of which 144 (22.9%) were women. Women were older (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hussain, Y., Kearney, K. E., Abbott, J. D., Kereiakes, D. J., Di Mario, C., Saito, S., … Lansky, A. J. (2022). Sex-Specific Outcomes After Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Patient-Level Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2021.100011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free