Equivalence of weak and strong modes of measures on topological vector spaces

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A strong mode of a probability measure on a normed space X can be defined as a point u such that the mass of the ball centred at u uniformly dominates the mass of all other balls in the small-radius limit. Helin and Burger weakened this definition by considering only pairwise comparisons with balls whose centres differ by vectors in a dense, proper linear subspace E of X, and posed the question of when these two types of modes coincide. We show that, in a more general setting of metrisable vector spaces equipped with measures that are finite on bounded sets, the density of E and a uniformity condition suffice for the equivalence of these two types of modes. We accomplish this by introducing a new, intermediate type of mode. We also show that these modes can be inequivalent if the uniformity condition fails. Our results shed light on the relationships between among various notions of maximum a posteriori estimator in non-parametric Bayesian inference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lie, H. C., & Sullivan, T. J. (2018). Equivalence of weak and strong modes of measures on topological vector spaces. Inverse Problems, 34(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aadef2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free