Continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea does not reduce arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes after one year of follow-up

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of 12-month continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and type 2 diabetes frequently co-exists. Both diseases increase arterial stiffness, a marker of cardiovascular risk. Treating OSA with CPAP may lower arterial stiffness. In a recent randomized trial, we found that CPAP treatment for 12 weeks did not reduce arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes patients with OSA. Participants from the randomized trial were invited to a follow-up study 12 months after inclusion. We evaluated arterial stiffness by measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) using SphygmoCor. Results: Forty-six patients (63.9% of the original 72 patients, age 63.8 ± 6.5 years, diabetes duration 16.1 ± 9.7 years, body mass index (BMI) 34.7 ± 3.9 kg/m2) partook in the study. Mean duration of CPAP treatment was 10.5 ± 1.5 months. Baseline cfPWV was 10.7 m/s. At follow-up cfPWV was 10.6 m/s, change in cfPWV:-0.12 m/s, 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.6, 0.4, P = 0.6. Baseline systolic blood pressure (BP) was 136.2 mm Hg. At follow-up BP was 137.9 mm Hg, change in BP: 1.6 mm Hg, 95% CI:-2.3, 5.5. Conclusions: We found no effect of 9-12-month CPAP treatment on arterial stiffness or BP in patients with long duration of type 2 diabetes and OSA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krogager, C., Banghoj, A. M., Poulsen, P. L., Kirkegaard, M. G., Thorsteinsson, B., Tarnow, L., … Hansen, K. W. (2021). Continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea does not reduce arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes after one year of follow-up. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 11(5), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.14740/jem773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free