Background Reporting adverse clinical events is essential to a culture of safety in healthcare. However, self-reporting such events is generally not widely prevalent in a typical academic anaesthesia department. Methods We set out to create a self-reporting tool to securely accept data from multiple anaesthesia service locations, including data linked to our electronic anaesthesia record, and combine them into an accessible database. We created a web-based database module for incident reporting integrated into the department's intranet. The system was also designed to actively prompt anaesthesia providers for reports following each day of clinical work. Results 478 events were recorded in the database in the first year of implementation. There were 33 347 anaesthesia encounters in that period, translating to a reporting rate of 1.43% (95% CI 1.31% to 1.57%). In the second year, which coincided with the second phase of implementation, 608 events were reported out of 45 985 anaesthesia encounters, for a reporting rate of 1.32% (95% CI 1.22% to 1.43%). Approximately 40% of events entered into the database occurred in a non-operating room location. The annual reporting rates for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 were 1.26% (95% CI 1.16% to 1.37%), 1.15% (95% CI 1.05% to 1.25%), 1% (95% CI 0.9% to 1.1%), 0.6% (95% CI 0.53% to 0.68%), 0.5% (95% CI 0.44% to 0.57%), 0.4% (95% CI 0.3% to 0.5%), respectively. Conclusions Our incident reporting system facilitated reporting of events within and outside the operating room. The system captured event data valid for quality improvement within the anaesthesia department.
CITATION STYLE
Ituk, U., & Mueller, R. (2023). Implementation and evaluation of an event reporting system in an academic anaesthesia department. BMJ Open Quality, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002389
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.