Three missing dimensions in contemporary studies of identity: The unconscious, negative attributes, and society

24Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Erik Erikson developed a distaste for his concept of identity because it was so frequently misused. He held that identity development is not at an "achievement" or an unalterable accomplishment. He was concerned that certain dimensions of identity had been systematically excluded. To Erikson, three essential dimensions-the unconscious, negatives, and society-were studiously ignored. In operationalizing identity such that its facets are measurable, researchers had underrepresented the construct. In order to return these three dimensions to the identity construct, I first explore Erikson's meaning of the construct. I then examine how he saw the unconscious, social forces, and negating dimensions as attributes that must be included in any portrayal of psychosocial identity. Sources for this paper are Erikson's major publications on identity and his unpublished Harvard papers. © 2012 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoare, C. (2013). Three missing dimensions in contemporary studies of identity: The unconscious, negative attributes, and society. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026546

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free