Appropriate exposure routes and doses in studies designed to assess developmental toxicity: A case study of inorganic arsenic

12Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Assessment of risks to human health from chemical agents is a complex process that requires the assembly, careful analysis, and integration of human and animal data collected from studies performed at different times, for disparate purposes, and under varying conditions. The application of risk assessment methods to data without consideration of the relevance of critical experimental parameters such as route of exposure or magnitude of dose can lead to specious determinations of the risk posed by exposure to environmental agents. A case study of the purported risk of developmental toxicity from inorganic arsenic is presented to illustrate (1) the nature of the problem, (2) how extant data from all studies are useful, (3) how appropriately designed modern studies can clarify the situation, and (4) how conflicted data should be evaluated in terms of appropriateness for use in risk assessment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacobson, C. F., Stump, D. G., Nemec, M. D., Holson, J. F., & DeSesso, J. M. (1999). Appropriate exposure routes and doses in studies designed to assess developmental toxicity: A case study of inorganic arsenic. In International Journal of Toxicology (Vol. 18, pp. 361–368). https://doi.org/10.1080/109158199225279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free