Is flux rope a necessary condition for the progenitor of coronal mass ejections?

29Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A magnetic flux rope structure is believed to exist in most coronal mass ejections (CMEs). However, it has been long debated whether the flux rope exists before eruption or if it is formed during eruption via magnetic reconnection. The controversy has continued because of our lack of routine measurements of the magnetic field in the pre-eruption structure, such as solar filaments. However, recently an indirect method was proposed to infer the magnetic field configuration based on the sign of helicity and the bearing direction of the filament barbs. In this paper, we apply this method to two erupting filament events, one on 2014 September 2 and the other on 2011 March 7, and find that the first filament is supported by a magnetic flux rope and the second filament is supported by a sheared arcade, i.e., the first one is an inverse-polarity filament and the second one is a normal-polarity filament. With the identification of the magnetic configurations in these two filaments, we stress that a flux rope is not a necessary condition for the pre-CME structure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ouyang, Y., Yang, K., & Chen, P. F. (2015). Is flux rope a necessary condition for the progenitor of coronal mass ejections? Astrophysical Journal, 815(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/72

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free