Knowing the operative game plan: A novel tool for the assessment of surgical procedural knowledge

7Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: What is the source of inadequate performance in the operating room? Is it a lack of technical skills, poor judgment or a lack of procedural knowledge? We created a surgical procedural knowledge (SPK) assessment tool and evaluated its use. Methods: We interviewed medical students, residents and training program staff on SPK assessment tools developed for 3 different common general surgery procedures: inguinal hernia repair with mesh in men, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and right hemicolectomy. The tools were developed as a step-wise assessment of specific surgic-al procedures based on techniques described in a current surgical text. We compared novice (medical student to postgraduate year [PGY]-2) and expert group (PGY-3 to program staff) scores using the Mann-Whitney U test. We calculated the total SPK score and defined a cut-off score using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: In all, 5 participants in 7 different training groups (n = 35) underwent an interview. Median scores for each procedure and overall SPK scores increased with experience. The median SPK for novices was 54.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.6-58.8) compared with 98.05 (95% CP 94.1-100.0) for experts (p = 0.012). The SPK cut-off score of 93.1 discriminates between novice and expert surgeons. Conclusion: Surgical procedural knowledge can reliably be assessed using our SPK assessment tool. It can discriminate between novice and expert surgeons for common general surgical procedures. Future studies are planned to evaluate its use for more complex procedures. © 2012 Association médicale canadienne.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balayla, J., Bergman, S., Ghitulescu, G., Feldman, L. S., & Fraser, S. A. (2012). Knowing the operative game plan: A novel tool for the assessment of surgical procedural knowledge. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 55(4 SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free