Efficiency and Reliability of Broiler Weighing Methods in Commercial Environments: A Comparative Evaluation

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Measuring the weight of broilers is one of the most important yet labor-intensive metrics to monitor throughout a flock’s development. This study aimed to comparatively assess two broiler weighing systems in a commercial production system: an automatic weighing system using a suspended platform, and a manual weighing system. Six flocks, comprising 25,000 birds each, were monitored weekly, and the weight results obtained by manual and automatic methods were compared. Up to the third week of this study, the birds were restricted to the central region of the shed, where the broiler coop was located. From the fourth week onwards, the birds were distributed into four sectors within the shed, divided by fences. Differences in weight were found between the regions of the sheds for the automatic weighing, which demonstrates that the use of an automatic scale for each division is necessary. For the manual weighing, the differences were only found in the last week of rearing, suggesting that throughout the cycle, the weighings could be performed in a single quadrant, representing the shed. Regarding the weighing method, there were statistical differences between manual and automatic weighing. The average values for automatic weighing were 1% lower than the average values for manual weighing. However, from a commercial point of view, this small difference between the methods does not impact the poultry industry. The rational use of automatic scales is recommended to optimize the monitoring of broiler chicken performance, reduce excessive handling and, consequently, minimize animal stress, promoting greater well-being.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pasian, I. M. D. L., Silveira, R. M. F., Reple, J. N., Couto, H. T. Z., & Silva, I. J. O. da. (2025). Efficiency and Reliability of Broiler Weighing Methods in Commercial Environments: A Comparative Evaluation. AgriEngineering, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7050141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free