Cognitive performance among the elderly and dietary fish intake: The Hordaland Health Study

127Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that cognitive impairment and dementia in older subjects might be influenced by a diet including seafood. Objective: The objective was to examine the cross-sectional relation between intake of different amounts of various seafood (fish and fish products) and cognitive performance. Design: The subjects (n = 2031 subjects; 55% women), aged 70-74 y, were recruited from the general population in Western Norway and underwent cognitive testing. A cognitive test battery included the Kendrick Object Learning Test, Trail Making Test (part A), modified versions of the Digit Symbol Test, Block Design, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test. Poor cognitive performance was defined as a score in the highest decile for the Trail Making Test and in the lowest decile for all other tests. Results: Subjects whose mean daily intake of fish and fish products was≥10 g/d (n = 1951) had significantly better mean test scores and a lower prevalence of poor cognitive performance than did those whose intake was <10 g/d (n = 80). The associations between total intake of seafood and cognition were strongly dose-dependent; the maximum effect was observed at an intake of ≈75 g/d. Most cognitive functions were influenced by fish intake. The effect was more pronounced for nonprocessed lean fish and fatty fish. Conclusions: In the elderly, a diet high in fish and fish products is associated with better cognitive performance in a dose-dependent manner. © 2007 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nurk, E., Drevon, C. A., Refsum, H., Solvoll, K., Vollset, S. E., Nygård, O., … Smith, A. D. (2007). Cognitive performance among the elderly and dietary fish intake: The Hordaland Health Study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 86(5), 1470–1478. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1470

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free