Abstract
This article defends three claims: (1) even if Rawls' difference principle permits incentives to induce talented people to be more productive, it does not follow that it permits inequalities; (2) the difference principle, when adequately specified, may in some circumstances permit incentives and allow that the worst off are not made as well off as they could be; and (3) an argument for incentives might pass Cohen's interpersonal test even if it is unsound and might not pass it even if it is sound. © 2008 The Author.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2008). Inequality, incentives and the interpersonal test. Ratio, 21(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00411.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.