Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD during Treatment Optimization

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background This study investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of objective and subjective measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prepharmacological and postpharmacological treatment. Methods Adults with ADHD (N = 77) completed the Quantified Behavioral Test, self-ratings of ADHD-related symptoms, and quality of life measures pretreatment and posttreatment. Results The use of objective and subjective measures of ADHD-related symptoms during initiation and follow-up of pharmacological treatment resulted in significant improvements in quality of life after 6 months. Both objective and subjective measures captured changes in ADHD-related symptoms, with more patients showing clinically relevant treatment effects on objective measures. Convergence rates between objective and subjective measures were low to moderate, and improvements on these measures correlated with increased quality of life. Conclusions Objective and subjective measures of ADHD capture important components of the condition. The findings from this study have important implications for clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin-Key, N. A., Stevenson, A., & Roy, P. (2022). Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD during Treatment Optimization. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 42(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free