Neonatal blood pressure monitoring: Visual assessment is an unreliable method for selecting cuff sizes

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To compare current practice of cuff size selection for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in a single-centre, tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (visual assessment of bladder width/limb length closest to 2/3) with common recommendations for appropriate cuff selection. Methods: Visual assessment of the appropriate cuff size ('2/3 rule') for upper arm, forearm and calf in 103 neonates (309 cuff selections) was compared with the following recommendations: (i) Method A - guidelines of the cuff manufacturer, (ii) Method B - cuff width/limb circumference ratio 0.44-0.60 and (iii) Method C - cuff width/limb length ratio closest to 0.66. Results: The upper arm cuff size was correctly chosen in 84% of cases (Method A), 43% (Method B) and 56% (Method C). The forearm cuff size was correctly chosen in 94% of cases (Method A), 68% (Method B) and 54% (Method C). The calf cuff size was correctly chosen in 96% of cases (Method A), 72% (Method B) and 63% (Method C). Conclusion: The accuracy of selecting cuff size by visual assessment is low. Further research on accurate cuff selection for neonates, including at the forearm and calf, is warranted. ©2013 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Devinck, A., Keukelier, H., De Savoye, I., Desmet, L., & Smets, K. (2013). Neonatal blood pressure monitoring: Visual assessment is an unreliable method for selecting cuff sizes. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, 102(10), 961–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free