Choosing Fitness-Enhancing innovations can be detrimental under fluctuating environments

6Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ability to predict the consequences of one's behavior in a particular environment is a mechanism for adaptation. In the absence of any cost to this activity, we might expect agents to choose behaviors that maximize their fitness, an example of directed innovation. This is in contrast to blind mutation, where the probability of becoming a new genotype is independent of the fitness of the new genotypes. Here, we show that under environments punctuated by rapid reversals, a system with both genetic and cultural inheritance should not always maximize fitness through directed innovation. This is because populations highly accurate at selecting the fittest innovations tend to over-fit the environment during its stable phase, to the point that a rapid environmental reversal can cause extinction. A less accurate population, on the other hand, can track long term trends in environmental change, keeping closer to the time-average of the environment. We use both analytical and agent-based models to explore when this mechanism is expected to occur. © 2011 Xue et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xue, J. Z., Costopoulos, A., & Guichard, F. (2011). Choosing Fitness-Enhancing innovations can be detrimental under fluctuating environments. PLoS ONE, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026770

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free