Effects of rapid-acting insulin analogues insulin glulisine and insulin aspart on postprandial glycemic excursion with single bout of exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes

5Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The analogue insulin glulisine (Glu) shows both more rapid onset and shorter duration of action compared with the other rapid-acting insulin analogues. The current study investigates these properties in regard to the occurrence of hypoglycemia related to exercise. A randomized, single-center, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients (all male, mean ± SD age of 51.9 ± 11.3 years; BMI: 25.5 ± 3.9 kg/m2; HbA1c: 11.2 ± 2.4 %). Glu or insulin aspart (Asp) was subcutaneously administered just before breakfast. Insulin dosage was determined as the usual dose of pre-prandial rapid-acting insulin for patients treated with insulin therapy or as 0.1 unit/kg for patients treated with oral anti-hyperglycemic agents. Sixty min after the start of eating, the patients began aerobic exercise on a bicycle ergometer for 30 min at 50% of maximum heart rate. Hypoglycemic episodes (plasma glucose level < 70 mg/dL with or without symptoms) were observed more frequently in Asp group (p < 0.05). Post-exercise plasma glucose levels at 90, 120, and 150 min were significantly lower in Asp group (p < 0.05). In patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (n = 6), postexercise blood glucose levels were significantly lower in Asp group (p < 0.05), while in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (n = 6) the difference was not significant. Glu may therefore be a suitable choice of rapid-acting insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk of post-exercise hypoglycemia.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanaka, N., & Hiura, Y. (2015). Effects of rapid-acting insulin analogues insulin glulisine and insulin aspart on postprandial glycemic excursion with single bout of exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocrine Journal, 62(5), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0610

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free