Temperature instability comparison of micro- and meso-scale Joule-Thomson cryocoolers employing mixed refrigerants

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Previously we demonstrated cryogenic cooling in a Joule-Thomson (JT) microcryocooler (MCC) with mixed refrigerants operating at pressure ratios of 16:1 that achieved stable temperatures of 140 K, with transient temperatures down to 76 K, with precooling of the refrigerant to 240 K. Pre-cooling improves the minimum enthalpy difference, (Δh T)min compared with that of pure fluids. Micro-scale compressors have been unavailable to meet 16:1 ratios. By reducing the ratio to 4:1, mini-compressors become viable in the near term. Utilizing mixed refrigerants optimized for 4:1 pressure ratios we compare the performance stability of this micro-JT employing a 25 mm long multichannel glass fiber heat exchanger (outer low-pressure capillary ID/OD=536 μm/617 μm, inner high-pressure channels ID/OD=75 μm/125 μm) with a scaled up (meso-scopic) version employing a 20 cm long single channel stainless steel heat exchanger (outer low pressure channel ID/OD=580 μm/760 μm, inner high pressure channel ID/OD=150 μm/266 μm). This easy to fabricate and modify meso-scale version was fabricated to investigate the temperature instabilities of mixed refrigerants for similar operating conditions but for proportionally higher flows of ∼ 30 cm/min compared with ∼ 10 cm/min. We compare measured pressures, flow rates, temperatures, and stabilities for both micro- and meso-JT cryocoolers to better understand the causes for the temperature instabilities within the micro-JT cryocooler. © 2012 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bradley, P. E., Radebaugh, R., Lewis, R. J., Lin, M. H., & Lee, Y. C. (2012). Temperature instability comparison of micro- and meso-scale Joule-Thomson cryocoolers employing mixed refrigerants. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1434, pp. 690–697). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4706980

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free