A Critical Analysis of Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomies Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomies Unassisted by Laparoscopy and Transabdominal Hysterectomies

36Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The first 115 laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies (LAVH) done by our faculty surgeons were compared with 220 vaginal hysterectomies (VH) and 194 abdominal hysterectomies (AH) done in our affiliated hospitals over the same period of time. Logistic regression analysis indicates that LAVHs were done for cases that would significantly be more likely selected for AH than for VH (p < 0.0001). Matched case control studies with 28 LAVH/VH and 34 LAVH/AH pairs and bivariate analyses demonstrated that LAVH can be accomplished with low morbidity, short lengths of stay, and little, if any, increase in operating times compared with VH and AH. The LAVH procedure can be expected to replace many AHs in the future. (J GYNECOL SURG 10:7, 1994) © 1994, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casey, M. J., Garcia-Padial, J., Johnson, C., Osborne, N. G., Sotolongo, J., & Watson, P. (1994). A Critical Analysis of Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomies Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomies Unassisted by Laparoscopy and Transabdominal Hysterectomies. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 10(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.1994.10.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free