The Return of Industrial Policy and the No-Longer Hidden Developmental State in the United States

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

After decades of market fundamentalism, the resurgence of industrial policy worldwide marks a major shift in economic governance. In the United States, this turn accelerated under the Biden administration, which enacted a series of landmark laws that put industrial policy squarely back at the center of national economic strategy. But to what extent did this wave of state activism mark a true departure? Skeptics have argued that “Bidenomics” marked a continuation of pro-business policies that merely “derisked” private investment. A second camp contends that US industrial policy never disappeared but persisted in “hidden” forms. This article advances a different interpretation. It contends that Bidenomics represented a fundamental reconfiguration of state-market relations and signaled the emergence of a twenty-first-century American developmental state. Three features distinguished this shift: directionality, targeting strategic sectors, regions, and communities; conditionality, linking corporate support to broad social objectives enforced by state discipline; and politicization, as industrial policy became a “visible” site of political contestation. Using policy analysis, expert interviews, and media sources, the article traces how this strategy has reshaped the architecture of state-market relations in the post-neoliberal era.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maggor, E. (2026). The Return of Industrial Policy and the No-Longer Hidden Developmental State in the United States. Politics and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292261450269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free