Infectious complications of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell immunotherapy

500Citations
Citations of this article
373Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Lymphodepletion chemotherapy with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T)-cell immunotherapy is a novel treatment for refractory or relapsed B-cell malignancies. Infectious complications of this approach have not been systematically studied. We evaluated infections occurring between days 0 to 90 in 133 patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells in a phase 1/2 study. We used Poisson and Cox regression to evaluate pre- and posttreatment risk factors for infection, respectively. The cohort included patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 47), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 24), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 62). There were 43 infections in 30 of 133 patients (23%) within 28 days after CAR-T-cell infusion with an infection density of 1.19 infections for every 100 days at risk. There was a lower infection density of 0.67 between days 29 and 90 (P = .02). The first infection occurred a median of 6 days after CAR-T-cell infusion. Six patients (5%) developed invasive fungal infections and 5 patients (4%) had life-threatening or fatal infections. Patients with ALL, ≥4 prior antitumor regimens, and receipt of the highest CAR-T-cell dose (2 × 107 cells per kg) had a higher infection density within 28 days in an adjusted model of baseline characteristics. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) severity was the only factor after CAR-T-cell infusion associated with infection in a multivariable analysis. The incidence of infections was comparable to observations from clinical trials of salvage chemoimmunotherapies in similar patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hill, J. A., Li, D., Hay, K. A., Green, M. L., Cherian, S., Chen, X., … Turtle, C. J. (2018). Infectious complications of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell immunotherapy. Blood, 131(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-07-793760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free